TOP LATEST FIVE LATEST PAKISTANI CASE LAW URBAN NEWS

Top latest Five latest pakistani case law Urban news

Top latest Five latest pakistani case law Urban news

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees use.

When the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according to the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

The an abundance of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made very clear that police is free to take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-discipline duties within the interim period. Read more

For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this sort of an appeal hasn't but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outdoors traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a significant alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and efficiently.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's practical for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to dispose of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has reached this sort of stage. Read more

Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be a person or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very here well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

Report this page